There is a difference between rules and laws and we as a society have been mislead about it.
A 'law' is constant and physically cannot be broken eg Newton's law of gravitation: if you throw a ball in to the air, no matter how rebellious the ball, not matter how forcefully you throw it, it will come back down again.
However, rules are arbitrary and whilst there maybe consequences for breaking them. they are breakable all the same eg. In the UK it is currently against 'the law' to posses certain herbs but if you found yourself in possession of these herbs, you would not magically be whisked away to a nearby jail cell, likely nothing would happen at all in fact. So it it isn't a law, it's just a rule.
We don't need to hire armed men in enforce laws, because laws are in force whether we want them to be or not but rules are completely arbitrary.
So why call them laws, when they are in fact rules, and not laws at all? Well, there is something going on here, something very subtle and very common so we hardly notice it at all, unless we look specifically for it, we are being tricked. A spell is being cast, but not the dramatic kind with smoke and demons summoned from other worlds but a very simple and very subtle glamour and this type of thing is happening all the time. As any magician knows, a good proportion of their business is a performance, theatre and misdirection. They put on grand and extravagant displays to demonstrate their power but it is only illusion, the actual trick is usually so insignificant and small that it would thoroughly disappoint it's audience in the cold light of day, if they noticed it at all. And that's what is happening here, governments put on great displays of pomp, heads of state paraded through the streets decked on gold and jewels, lined by impractically dressed soldiers (all smoke and mirrors to demonstrate their 'power' and to distract from the actual trick) which is subtly misname things. You see, language is very powerful. Buddha said "With our thoughts we make the world" and language can alter our perceptions of the world, control our language, and you control our world. So when those men speak from their podiums of power, they weave little spells with each sentence and those spells are cast through out our world through TV, Newspapers, notices and eventually through you and I. When they call their rules 'laws' in our minds, they become laws, unbreakable and constant, we don't think of them as arbitrary rules any more. But it doesn't stop there, this is happening all the time. Another particularly repugnant example is the use of the term 'benefits' used to describe social security payments. It's used so often and so broadly that we hardly question it, even those who speak and campaign in support of social security fall in to the trap by calling them 'benefits'. They are not benefits but a meagre insurance policy to protect society against the myriad evils of poverty but by calling them 'benefits' these political spell-casters are able frame people who cash in their policy (well all pay for it one way or another, through taxes, that's what they are for) as 'scroungers' living the high life as if it were some kind of a bonus. Of course, the actual benefits these spell-casters receive are never referred to as such, they are 'expenses' or 'allowances' as if they were unavoidable and acceptable in spite of the fact that they are invariably luxuries (and therefore completely avoidable) whereas a minimal amount to afford a person vulnerable in their poverty food and shelter (the bare basic requirements of survival for any mammal) are labelled a luxury, a bonus, a benefit.
Be very wary of those who speak with forked-tongues and be mindful of the words you speak, words have great power. It's called 'spelling' for a reason....
A 'law' is constant and physically cannot be broken eg Newton's law of gravitation: if you throw a ball in to the air, no matter how rebellious the ball, not matter how forcefully you throw it, it will come back down again.
However, rules are arbitrary and whilst there maybe consequences for breaking them. they are breakable all the same eg. In the UK it is currently against 'the law' to posses certain herbs but if you found yourself in possession of these herbs, you would not magically be whisked away to a nearby jail cell, likely nothing would happen at all in fact. So it it isn't a law, it's just a rule.
We don't need to hire armed men in enforce laws, because laws are in force whether we want them to be or not but rules are completely arbitrary.
So why call them laws, when they are in fact rules, and not laws at all? Well, there is something going on here, something very subtle and very common so we hardly notice it at all, unless we look specifically for it, we are being tricked. A spell is being cast, but not the dramatic kind with smoke and demons summoned from other worlds but a very simple and very subtle glamour and this type of thing is happening all the time. As any magician knows, a good proportion of their business is a performance, theatre and misdirection. They put on grand and extravagant displays to demonstrate their power but it is only illusion, the actual trick is usually so insignificant and small that it would thoroughly disappoint it's audience in the cold light of day, if they noticed it at all. And that's what is happening here, governments put on great displays of pomp, heads of state paraded through the streets decked on gold and jewels, lined by impractically dressed soldiers (all smoke and mirrors to demonstrate their 'power' and to distract from the actual trick) which is subtly misname things. You see, language is very powerful. Buddha said "With our thoughts we make the world" and language can alter our perceptions of the world, control our language, and you control our world. So when those men speak from their podiums of power, they weave little spells with each sentence and those spells are cast through out our world through TV, Newspapers, notices and eventually through you and I. When they call their rules 'laws' in our minds, they become laws, unbreakable and constant, we don't think of them as arbitrary rules any more. But it doesn't stop there, this is happening all the time. Another particularly repugnant example is the use of the term 'benefits' used to describe social security payments. It's used so often and so broadly that we hardly question it, even those who speak and campaign in support of social security fall in to the trap by calling them 'benefits'. They are not benefits but a meagre insurance policy to protect society against the myriad evils of poverty but by calling them 'benefits' these political spell-casters are able frame people who cash in their policy (well all pay for it one way or another, through taxes, that's what they are for) as 'scroungers' living the high life as if it were some kind of a bonus. Of course, the actual benefits these spell-casters receive are never referred to as such, they are 'expenses' or 'allowances' as if they were unavoidable and acceptable in spite of the fact that they are invariably luxuries (and therefore completely avoidable) whereas a minimal amount to afford a person vulnerable in their poverty food and shelter (the bare basic requirements of survival for any mammal) are labelled a luxury, a bonus, a benefit.
Be very wary of those who speak with forked-tongues and be mindful of the words you speak, words have great power. It's called 'spelling' for a reason....